Comparative study between specular microscopy, pentacam and anterior segment optical coherence tomography in assessment of central corneal thickness
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background; Central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements are important for determining intraocular pressure (IOP), examining endothelium activity, and assessing patients before after refractive surgery . Contact non-contact techniques can be used to assess CCT, Aim objectives: in individuals with healthy corneas, CCT values taken three distinct devices: noncontact specular microscope, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), pentacam, Subjects methods; This is observational prospective cross-sectional study, done at the outpatient clinics of Al-Azhar University hospitals on 100 eyes, Result: Regarding correlation between measured by Pentacam assessed AS-OCT Specular microscopy. There was high positive (r=0.887, p < 0.001) & microscopy (r=0.863,p 0.001), Conclusion; normal mentioned devices have a good correlation. Because there statistically significant variance, they cannot utilized interchangeably.Ultrasonic pachmetry recommended cases borderline pentacam pachymetric readings,
منابع مشابه
Comparison of central corneal thickness measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography versus ultrasonic pachymetry.
PURPOSE To compare central corneal thickness measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasonic pachymetry (UP). METHOD A prospective, observational and cross-sectional study was performed. The central corneal thickness was measured in 112 eyes of 112 consecutive patients with AS-OCT and UP. All examinations were performed by the same examiner. The measurement...
متن کاملAnterior segment optical coherence tomography in corneal and conjunctival pathology
METHODS: Retrospective study which included patients examined using AS-OCT (HD-Cirrus) between June and December 2011. e following information was obtained: diagnosis, surgical procedure, AS-OCT image usefulness/quality, biomicroscopy photographs. Cases were classi ed into the following groups: 1. e AS-OCT provided a satisfactory image and provided additional information to that obtained by bio...
متن کاملComparison of central corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry versus slit-lamp optical coherence tomography, specular microscopy, and Orbscan
BACKGROUND Central corneal thickness (CCT) can be measured by using contact and non-contact methods. Ultrasound pachymetry (US pachymetry) is a contact method for measuring CCT and is perhaps the most commonly used method. However, non-contact methods like scanning slit topography (Orbscan II), slit-lamp optical coherence tomography (SL-OCT), and specular microscopy are also used. Not many stud...
متن کاملMeasurement of corneal and limbal epithelial thickness by anterior segment optical coherence tomography and in vivo confocal microscopy
BACKGROUND To compare corneal epithelial thickness (CET) and limbal epithelial thickness (LET) measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and in vivo confocal microscope (IVCM) in normal subjects, and evaluate the consistency between them. METHODS Thirty-eight normal subjects (17 men and 21 women) were enrolled in this study. AS-OCT was performed at central cornea and ...
متن کاملAnterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography: Assisted Topographic Corneal Epithelial Thickness Distribution Imaging of a Keratoconus Patient
PURPOSE To evaluate safety, efficacy and ease of measurement of epithelial thickness in a keratoconic patient based on anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). METHODS A 25-year-old male patient, previously diagnosed with keratoconus, with highly asymmetric manifestation among the two eyes, was subjected to AS-OCT corneal epithelial imaging. We investigated epithelial thickness...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Al-Azhar International Medical Journal (Print)
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2682-3381', '2682-339X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/aimj.2022.112481.1746